The income property: Your late-in-life retirement plan
"Income property can be an important bridge to retirement for those
without quite enough to retire in the traditional sense," says J.
Camarda, a real estate investor, Certified Financial Planner, and Chief
Investment Officer of Jacksonville, Fla.-based Camarda Wealth Advisors.
Because real estate is such an inefficient market, it's possible to find
awesome bargains with a very high return on investment, Camarda says.
And if you can manage the property yourself, you can collect more
income.
If you purchase the right property at the right price and on the right
terms, he says, a rental property can produce significantly more income
than traditional passive investments.
This article will describe how much you can expect to invest and earn,
how to choose a location for your rental property, and problems that
might derail your plans if you aren't careful.
How Much Money Do You Need?
If you plan to finance your purchase with a mortgage, you'll need to
take action before you retire, says associate broker Janice Leis, who
serves the premier residential areas of Philadelphia and South Florida.
Mortgage lending guidelines typically require applicants to be employed
and have at least two years of steady employment history in the same
occupation.
[Click to compare mortgage rates from multiple lenders on Yahoo! Homes now.]
Lenders also require a substantial down payment, typically 30% or more,
if you won't be occupying the property, says John Walters of LeWalt
Consulting Groupe in St. Petersburg, Fla.
If you don't have the cash to make such a large down payment, consider
using your IRA funds. All equity growth and income from rental receipts
will grow inside your IRA tax-free, Walters says. Purchasing the
property with funds inside a Roth IRA, on which you've already paid
taxes, means all your earnings and equity can grow tax-free forever, he
says.
After you've tackled the hurdle of affording the purchase, you need to
think about ongoing expenses. Owning residential income property is like
owning a principal residence in that there are variable expenses
outside the mortgage, says Rob Albertson, a multi-million dollar
residential real estate agent with Austin Fine Properties/PLR in Austin,
Texas. There are maintenance costs for minor items (like leaky faucets)
and major items (like a new roof).
Don't forget about marketing expenses and periods of vacancy and tenant
change-over when you won't be earning income. Albertson recommends
factoring no higher than a 92% occupancy rate into your calculations,
even in a hot rental market. Be conservative in your estimates of
expenses and income.
Tax considerations will also play into what you can afford.
"One of the chief benefits associated with rental property is the
ability to claim a depreciation deduction on your federal income tax
return," Walters says. Depreciation reduces the value of your property
each year to approximate wear and tear. It lowers your tax basis so that
you pay less tax on the property when you sell it.
First and foremost, discuss the financial feasibility of your plans with
a CPA, a real estate attorney and an insurance agent to see how much
everything will cost, recommends Leis.
Get valuable interest rate discounts on select new home equity loans from Wells Fargo.
Choose a Location
Purchasing the least expensive property you can find won't help you earn
a return on your investment if you can't find renters and produce cash
flow, says Jenny Usaj, managing broker and owner of Usaj Realty in
Denver, Colo.
"Ask a trusted local professional what the best area is for the rental
market," Usaj says. "While the price might be a bit higher in better
areas, the time marketing the property will decrease as well as the time
it might sit vacant. If you are unsure where to find rentals, start
near downtown or near a college campus. Rental residences often follow
employment opportunities."
It's also important to take a look around the neighborhood and purchase a
property that reflects the area's current demographic, says Usaj.
"Is the area populated with single adults or families? Will a
one-bedroom or three-bedroom residence be more appealing to the renters
nearby? Again, be careful not to jump at the best bargain on the market.
Make sure the property will appeal to the lifestyle of the area," she
says.
[Ready to shop around for mortgage rates? Click to get started.]
What Will You Earn?
"You want to earn at least 8% from the capital invested in the rental,
net of all expenses," says John Graves, managing principal of an
independent RIA, editor of the "Retirement Journal" and author of "The
7% Solution: You CAN Afford a Comfortable Retirement." Expenses include
the mortgage, taxes, insurance, maintenance, a 10% property management
fee and a 10% vacancy allowance.
If you invest $100,000 in the property, you want to be earning a net
income of $8,000 a year, he says. The reasoning behind the 8% is that it
compensates you for the risk and lack of liquidity of your investment.
If you or your spouse can work on the property by doing repairs and
maintenance and/or managing the property, those costs will decline, he
says.
Potential Problems
Investment property owners could run into a number of problems,
including renters who fail to pay, excessive maintenance costs and
difficulty finding tenants, says Cameron Novak, real estate broker and
owner of the Homefinding Center in Corona, Calif.
Working with a reputable real estate agent with references to find your
investment property is also important, he says. Any loss of capital when
you're near retirement age can be devastating.
Many municipalities have imposed drastic inspections and fees on
landlords who want to turn owner-occupied properties into rentals, says
John Braun, a real-estate attorney with Thomas Law Group in Minneapolis
and a seasoned real estate investor. Potential investors should look
into this issue before committing to a purchase. They should also be
aware that homestead exemptions don't apply to investment properties,
which can mean higher property tax bills.
Would-be landlords should evaluate their temperaments before jumping
into property ownership. The job requires tolerance of other people's
personalities and living habits, Leis says.
You should also think about whether you want to do the required work.
You'll often hear real estate ownership referred to as a form of passive
income, but that description isn't really accurate.
"Owning residential income property is not a hands-free affair,"
Albertson says. "If you don't want to manage the property, or can't, as
in you live out of town, you will be looking at 8% to 10% of your gross
rents going to a management company to cover rent collection and repair
requests."
Finally, selecting the right tenants is key.
"The best advice I can give to income property owners is to perform as
thorough a tenant screening as possible," says Albertson. "This is not
the part of the process to get lazy or just be happy to get a tenant in
to pay your bills - this is who you are entrusting with your retirement
asset, so you'd better be sure you are not setting yourself up for
disaster or numerous headaches."
The Bottom Line
Owning income-producing property can be a viable resource to provide
retirement income and leave a legacy to pass on to your beneficiaries,
says Walters.
But it's important to have as much knowledge as you can going into the
purchase so you have realistic monetary expectations and are able to
preserve your nest egg, Albertson notes.
Amy Fontinelle is a financial journalist and editor for a variety of
websites, public policy organizations and book publishers. She has
written hundreds of published articles and blog posts on topics
including budgeting, credit management, real estate and investing. Her
articles have been featured on the homepage of Yahoo! and on Yahoo!
Finance, Forbes.com, SFGate.com and numerous local news websites.
Tuesday, September 18, 2012
5 Reasons to Buy a Home Now
Based on prices, mortgage rates and soaring rents, there may have
never been a better time in real estate history to purchase a home than
right now. Here are five major reasons purchasers should consider
buying:
by The KCM Crew on September 17, 2012
Prices will bounce along the bottom this winter. However, projections call for appreciation after that. Several studies and surveys call for price increases over the next few years starting in 2013. One such survey shows that prices will increase over 10% by 2016.
Supply Is Shrinking
With inventory declining in many regions, finding a home of your dreams may become more difficult going forward. There are buyers in more and more markets surprised that there is no longer a large assortment of houses to choose from. The best homes in the best locations sell first. Don’t miss the opportunity to get that ‘once-in-a-lifetime’ buy.Price Increases Are on the Horizon
5 Reasons to Buy a Home Nowby The KCM Crew on September 17, 2012
Prices will bounce along the bottom this winter. However, projections call for appreciation after that. Several studies and surveys call for price increases over the next few years starting in 2013. One such survey shows that prices will increase over 10% by 2016.
Rents Are Skyrocketing
Rents historically increase by 3.2% on an annual basis. A study issued earlier this year projects rent increases of 4% for the next two years. Trulia recently reported that rents this year have actually shot up by 5.4%.Interest Rates Are at Historic Lows
Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke has kept interest rates low in an effort to stimulate a lethargic economy. He understands that low rates will help housing and housing is a key to bringing back the economy. As the economy approves, the need to keep rates low will no longer exist. The 30-year-mortgage rate before the financial crisis was 6.57% (August 2007).Buy Low, Sell High
We would all agree that, when investing, we want to buy at the lowest price possible and hope to sell at the highest price. Housing can create family wealth as long as we follow this simple principle. Today, real estate is selling ‘low’. It’s time to buy.Monday, September 17, 2012
Buying Is 45% Cheaper Than Renting, Trulia Says
Buying is 45% Cheaper Than Renting
In every one of the 100 largest metros in the country, savings for homeowners are staggering.
The stars have aligned for home affordability, according to a new analysis by Trulia which found that rising rents and low lending rates have conspired to make purchasing a home 45% less expensive than renting, on average, in the 100 largest U.S. metros.
That savings, which averages to $771 a month, does come with some conditions: It depends upon buyers qualifying for a 3.5% mortgage rate; it also is conditional upon buyers staying in their home for seven years, the average time that Americans have historically stayed in a home before moving; and it requires that buyers fall into the 25% tax bracket and itemize their tax deductions to take advantage of benefits afforded to homeowners. Trulia’s analysis also assumed that buyers put down a 20% down payment.
When those factors are in place, "homeownership is cheaper than renting in all of the 100 largest metros by a wide margin," wrote Jed Kolko, Trulia’s chief economist and head of analytics, in discussing the findings. "There is no market where the financial decision is even close."
Even the smallest difference between renting and buying, found in Honolulu, still produced a savings of 24%. The largest savings was logged by Detroit, where buying is a staggering 70% cheaper, even with all closing costs, maintenance, insurance, taxes, and other costs taken into account.
In dollar amounts, even savings on the lower end of the scale translate into large sums. Kolko points to San Francisco, which logged the second-smallest savings for buyers at 28%. Dollar savings in that metro would still come to $899 annually.
Even when conditions are less than ideal—if buyers stay for only five years, don’t itemize, and only qualify for a 4.5% mortgage rate—buying still remains cheaper than renting in 96 of the largest 100 metros, although savings shrink.
So, given the financial incentives, why are sales still dragging and the homeownership rate dropping? "The big obstacle holding back renters who want to buy is the down payment—even more than getting a mortgage," Kolko said, based on Trulia’s most recent survey of consumers. On top of the years it takes many buyers to save money for a down payment, unemployment has eroded the savings of many families during the recession. However, that problem is likely to be less of an obstacle among new-home buyers, he says, since those buyers tend to have higher incomes.
So how long will the housing market enjoy such a strong affordability advantage? "Owning will stay more affordable than renting" for some time, Kolko wrote in an email to Builder. "Right now, the gap is very wide. Even if mortgage rates rose significantly, buying would still be much cheaper than renting in most metros."
Claire Easley is a senior editor at Builder.
In every one of the 100 largest metros in the country, savings for homeowners are staggering.
The stars have aligned for home affordability, according to a new analysis by Trulia which found that rising rents and low lending rates have conspired to make purchasing a home 45% less expensive than renting, on average, in the 100 largest U.S. metros.
That savings, which averages to $771 a month, does come with some conditions: It depends upon buyers qualifying for a 3.5% mortgage rate; it also is conditional upon buyers staying in their home for seven years, the average time that Americans have historically stayed in a home before moving; and it requires that buyers fall into the 25% tax bracket and itemize their tax deductions to take advantage of benefits afforded to homeowners. Trulia’s analysis also assumed that buyers put down a 20% down payment.
When those factors are in place, "homeownership is cheaper than renting in all of the 100 largest metros by a wide margin," wrote Jed Kolko, Trulia’s chief economist and head of analytics, in discussing the findings. "There is no market where the financial decision is even close."
Even the smallest difference between renting and buying, found in Honolulu, still produced a savings of 24%. The largest savings was logged by Detroit, where buying is a staggering 70% cheaper, even with all closing costs, maintenance, insurance, taxes, and other costs taken into account.
In dollar amounts, even savings on the lower end of the scale translate into large sums. Kolko points to San Francisco, which logged the second-smallest savings for buyers at 28%. Dollar savings in that metro would still come to $899 annually.
Even when conditions are less than ideal—if buyers stay for only five years, don’t itemize, and only qualify for a 4.5% mortgage rate—buying still remains cheaper than renting in 96 of the largest 100 metros, although savings shrink.
So, given the financial incentives, why are sales still dragging and the homeownership rate dropping? "The big obstacle holding back renters who want to buy is the down payment—even more than getting a mortgage," Kolko said, based on Trulia’s most recent survey of consumers. On top of the years it takes many buyers to save money for a down payment, unemployment has eroded the savings of many families during the recession. However, that problem is likely to be less of an obstacle among new-home buyers, he says, since those buyers tend to have higher incomes.
So how long will the housing market enjoy such a strong affordability advantage? "Owning will stay more affordable than renting" for some time, Kolko wrote in an email to Builder. "Right now, the gap is very wide. Even if mortgage rates rose significantly, buying would still be much cheaper than renting in most metros."
Claire Easley is a senior editor at Builder.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)